{"id":1724,"date":"2026-08-20T19:15:51","date_gmt":"2026-08-20T19:15:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/footballars.xyz\/?p=1724"},"modified":"2026-08-20T19:15:51","modified_gmt":"2026-08-20T19:15:51","slug":"finally-chelsea-could-offload-bluecos-worst-ever-signing-as-two-permanent-bids-made","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/footballars.xyz\/?p=1724","title":{"rendered":"Finally, Chelsea could offload BlueCo’s worst-ever signing as two permanent bids made"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\"\"\/ Add as preferred source on Google<\/span> <\/a> <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

Chelsea have made some terrible signings since BlueCo bought the club from Roman Abramovich in 2022. Some players have been signed and sold without even playing once.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Gaga Slonina joined the club four years ago<\/a> and is yet to make a competitive appearance for Chelsea<\/a>. It is a prime example of BlueCo\u2019s issues treating players as commodities, failing to see the bigger picture.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/header>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Which Chelsea signing will have the best 26\/27 season, and why?<\/h3>\n

Will anyone top Joao Pedro’s impact last season?<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"Chelsea<\/div>
Photo by Darren Walsh\/Chelsea FC via Getty Images<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/section>\n

This summer, it has been different. Behdad Eghbali is having a bigger impact behind the scenes, and Blues fans like what they see. More experience has been added, Xabi Alonso<\/a> given the manager title.<\/p>\n

But the long-term effects of BlueCo\u2019s ownership in the transfer market continue to have an impact. Players are still on the books who have no business being at Chelsea, and one is Deivid Washington<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Offers on the table for Deivid Washington as exit draws close<\/h2>\n

Bought in 2023 for \u00a317m from Santos, many felt it could be the second coming of Neymar given the club he was signed for. Two years on, and he is yet to play for Chelsea. A loan return to Santos ended in failure.<\/p>\n

Reports said that Deivid might take up the third and final loan spot at Strasbourg<\/a>, after Genesis Antwi and Filip Jorgensen. But now, reporter Santi Aouna<\/a> claims there are permanent offers on the table for Deivid.<\/p>\n

\n
\"Sheffield<\/div>
Photo by Richard Sellers\/Sportsphoto\/Allstar via Getty Images<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Posting on X, Aouna reported that Deivid is the subject of offers from Strasbourg and Spanish side Sevilla, while Marseille have made an enquiry to land the 21-year-old. It is unclear how much Chelsea want.<\/p>\n

\u201cOM has made inquiries about Deivid Washington. The Brazilian has looked into OM, the city, and the club with Luis Henrique. Strasbourg and Sevilla have already submitted an official offer to Chelsea.\u201d<\/p>\n

What would be the book value of Deivid Washington right now?<\/h2>\n

Bought for \u00a317m in 2023, Washington is three years into the five-year player amortisation period. The fee might have seemed a bargain at the time. Ultimately, it is a sign of just how badly BlueCo have it wrong.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
<\/header>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Chelsea\u2019s academy will now be known as Cobham Next Gen, is this a worrying sign?<\/h3>\n

Just where is this ownership taking the club?<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/div>\n<\/figure><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/section>\n

That means each year is worth \u00a33.4m on his contract, and now, three years into that period, Deivid is, so far, \u00a310.2m into his \u00a317m fee. It means anything above \u00a36.8m received for Deivid would be a profit.<\/p>\n

Whether any club is actually willing to part with \u00a36.8m or more for Deivid remains to be seen, especially given he has not played regular senior football since leaving Santos permanently back in 2023.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/svg><\/p>\n
Join Our Newsletter<\/span><\/p>\n

Receive a digest of our best Chelsea content each week direct to your mailbox<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n